|
KMID : 1124020170330040241
|
|
Korean Social Security Studies
2017 Volume.33 No. 4 p.241 ~ p.268
|
|
|
The Limitation of Social Rented Housing Policy and the Comparison of Policy Differences due to Partisanship in New Zealand Housing Policy
|
|
Eun Min-Su
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
Given the overall changes in the New Zealand economic policy and social policy, the housing policy was changed dramatically in the 1990s by promoting market processes and forcing the country to shift its state further from the housing market directly. The National Party implemented the transformation of the housing assistance system, the transition to the subject of housing (housing), and the reorganization of the national housing in the national sector, and the reorganization of the national housing inventory in the national sector. However, the reforms pushed for equity, efficiency, and consumer choice have negatively affected national tenants and did not contribute to affordable housing prices. The Labor Party wanted to restore the country's role in the housing problem by rejecting the "market model" and forcing the country to directly intervene in housing issues through reintroduction of income related rents and establishment of HNZC. Though it vowed to change the radical reform of the 1990s, the Labor Party's housing policy remained intact in the residential models of the public sector, just because it maintained the only social rent demand for the needy.
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
|
|
housing policy, social rented housing policy, partisanship, asset-based welfare, superannuation, income related rents
|
|
|
FullTexts / Linksout information
|
|
|
|
|
|
Listed journal information
|
|
|
|